Confidentiality: A Limit To Your Choice Of Counsel
12 May 2020
Parties to a dispute want to choose their preferred external counsel, traditionally subject to the direct conflict of interest where the counterparty is an existing or was a former client. In some cases, this may mean appointing a legal team which successfully acted for another client against the same defendant on a previous similar matter. This choice may no longer be an unfettered one.
The recent Court of Appeal case of LVM Law Chambers LLC v Wan Hoe Keet  SGCA 29 articulated in its judgment the requirements which must be met before a court would restrain a lawyer from acting against the same counterparty in a previous set of proceedings.
This article discusses this decision and also considers confidentiality obligations arising from mediation.
Please click here to read the update.